The game play in Call of Duty feels more natural and the graphics are better a well. Call of Duty is better when playing online a well. There are always much more people playing it online than Battlefield. Because for example if. Join mid game battlefield you are likely to be killed by a jet or helicopter if u do not have any experienced players on your team it can be hard if not quite difficult to take down a jet or helicopter.
By this I mean the game is not friendly to new players. With cod being new doesn't make it any harder for you because the default classes can sometimes consist of some of the best weapons in the game for example MW3 game u the ump and the striker as default weapons giving the new players good weapons to start then off.
There are many more arguments I could use but most of them have already been said basically battlefield is more realistic while COD is generally more fast paced and more and fun.
For example: 1. They copied Battlefield knife animation 2. They copied the idea of destructible environments 3. They implemented vehicles in the trailer you see a character riding in a heli DICE should not put up with this, as all those feature were in battlefield since My first COD was Black ops. I loved it, played it almost everyday. I met friends on there who I still talk to 3 years later. I continued to play COD, got a new one every year, not because it was new.
I got it because my friends got it, plain and simple. Now 3 years later I have matured more and realized that COD just annoys me now. Host migration, lag, little 10 year olds, etc. I started playing Battlefield and I loved it. The idea of being able to be a jet pilot or a rouge sniper whenever I wanted was awesome.
COD sucks. Oh and reading the COD fanboy arguments on the left made me laugh. Call of Duty is a one-dimensional game. That is to say, the only focus is to kill people. That's it. As such, it's "huge variety of maps" are all tiny, to promote the killing.
First of all, Battlefield HAS exactly that kind of gameplay for those who want it, so it's already on an equal standpoint.
There are plenty of small maps in Battlefield 3, as well as an abundance of utterly gigantic maps. Battlefield 3's greatness lies in that there are nearly limitless ways to kill your enemies, and it rewards creativity. Want to stay old-fashioned and kill people with just your guns? Great, go ahead. Want to kill people by loading a vehicle with C4, driving it into the enemy base, jumping out and detonating it, killing everything in a giant fire ball of death?
You can do that. Not only are there a ridiculous number of avenues for taking you enemies down, they're all fairly balanced. A sniper can shoot the pilots out of flying vehicles, an engineer can utterly destroy ground vehicles with RPGs or landmines. Each and every class has it's strengths, but somehow lack many weaknesses. What does Call of Duty have? Oh yeah, the same old "12 year-olds shooting each other on some guy's lawn" game.
There's no variety in that. Call of Duty's popularity is one of life's greatest mysteries. Battlefield 3 has far more variety, not only in content, but in gameplay, than the entire Call of Duty franchise has to offer. More realistic and requires skills and fast thinking. This game is amazing in its own way. The guns are just right when it comes down to knocking down a enemy and you have to think every step you take because you never know who is going to take you tags.
Of course, everyone has different opinions, I understand that COD is a pretty decent game franchise, but it's just the same thing over and over again, it also doesn't really require much strategy either. Cod is times better becuase it is better in every way and you can do other stuff on cod then walk arond and get shot. Theres story mode, Arcade, Zombies you shoot them they don't shoot you you can play with your freinds and you do have support drops and equipment that you can use.
Bf is trash. You run around in a way to big map just to get melted from someone a mile away. It takes way to long to lvl up and get good guns in BF as well.
The Main menu and create a class are way to confusing too. I've always been really good at cod. I tried BF and it sucked. If your new to fps start with cod. I always loved the fast paced gameplay of Call of Duty. I played Battlefield, yes. But I felt Call of Duty gave me more content to play with.
In Battlefield, I could play a forgettable Singleplayer. Over all good coop, and a Multiplayer. But in Call of Duty..
Say Modern Warfare 3? I could play an epic Singleplayer, fun Survival mode, Great spec ops missions returning from MW2, and a Multiplayer mode which is always fun. Call of Duty has made it into our hearts with characters that are memorable. Remember when Ghost,and Roach died. People from Alex Mason to Captain Price they have made their way into our hearts.
Call of Duty multiplayer is WAY more fast paced and you can't get run over by your wanna be troll teammates. The customization is better and their is one mor. E thing. Even though I have played Call of Duty a lot more than Battlefield, that will not influence my answer to this question and make give one that is biased.
I feel when it comes to popular first-person shooters, it is really up to the person playing the game to decide which one works for them. By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.
Google Search. Post Your Opinion. Create New Poll. Sign In Sign Up. Add a New Topic. It will also be optimized for next-gen consoles and hopefully probably won't break them like Black Ops Cold War. It has already been announced that Battlefield 6 will allow multiplayer matches of up to players. There will also be weather effects and game-changing destruction! Yes, yes, many of you will now scream "But Warzone has players! Battlefield 6 pits two teams of up to 64 players each against each other on foot, in a tank, in the air, or even on water.
Even more exciting, though, are the Battlefield 6 weather effects and destruction. We all remember the collapsing skyscraper on Siege of Shanghai in Battlefield 4 that changed the whole map. Or the sandstorms in Battlefield 1 that took away your vision, and made planes virtually unusable. I mean, imagine how all the Warzone campers would howl if you could just flatten their house, or blow it up Call of Duty WW2: Vanguard , how can you possibly stack up to that?
According to leaks, Battlefield 6 will be set around the year , in the near future, and will have a Modern Warfare setting. It might not sound like much now, but honestly what are you up for more?
World War 2 for the hundredth time, or a cool Modern Warfare setting?
0コメント